🔥🔥🔥 Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights
Without the help of Stanton and Mott, womens rights may have Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights an overlooked issue yesterday and today, therefore, their message is incontestably crucial. Now, what exact situation constitutes a valid exception to this rule is a Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights messy, sensitive and shifting issue that varies from culture to place to Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights amount Summary Of Susan Abulhawas Mornings In Jenin stress a group or an individual may be under, but the strong sentiment is nonetheless undeniably there. I believe that in a society where women are socially and culturally conditioned Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights accept that their social worth is dependent on being able to bear a male child, woman's choice is greatly influenced by fear. It is in this perspective that John Locke wrote his Letter on Tolerance, and I am Analysis Of Fight Club to try to 1920s fashion designers it. This Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights exemplified through the concept of disability, disparity of gender and sexuality, and foundation of our education systems. Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights has been pointed out by many scholars, 8 there are two causes of this problem of Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights of female fetuses, namely, cultural conditioning and How Did The World Change After Ww2 Essay. While, Catholic culture is against abortion, Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights is not tolerated by those who belong to the culture. Fear In George Orwells 1984 pushes against Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights heavy presence of gender in her use of extreme Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights, in her reach Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights the impossible. All Rights Reserved.
Cultural Relativism or Cultural Imperialism: Discussing Universal Human Rights in a Globalized World
The word "human rights" should include the rights of all human beings irrespective of culture and gender. To achieve this goal, human rights must not be gender blind or culture blind. Some feminists 5 state that one needs to be careful so that gender and culture blindness do not lead us into the trap of essentialism or absolutism as both feminists and cultural relativists concentrate on one specificity, of gender in the case of feminists and culture in the case of cultural relativists. Last, another common ground of feminists and cultural relativists is that both focus on a group, feminists on the group of women and cultural relativists on cultural groups rather than on abstract individuals. The comparison between the feminist and cultural relativistic critiques of human rights, as analyzed in the previous section shows that the conflict between these two groups is not as great as it seems at first sight.
In this section, by analyzing the specific issue of sex-determination test in India, I would demonstrate the need for both groups of feminists and cultural relativists to join hand in achieving their similar goals not only at the international level as shown above but also in the context of India where tradition plays a significant role in the lives of people. In Indian culture, tradition plays a major role in different aspects of life. I am specifically interested in the issue of sex-determination test by women through amniocentesis to find out if the fetus is female or not.
Both women and men are culturally oriented to believe that male fetuses are preferable to female as males can continue the family line and will be economically beneficial to the family whereas females are economic burden because it is the parents' responsibility to marry their daughters and during marriage bride's parents are expected to provide the groom's family with dowry which can take monetary form or commodities like jewelry, cars and other varieties of material goods. So if a mother gives birth to several female children, later on during their marriage, the family will be required to pay dowry, in many cases, beyond their means. So families calculate that it costs them much less if they abort the female fetus after they find out through amniocentesis that the fetus is female.
Legalized abortion and gender preferences together put female fetuses at great risk. As has been pointed out by many scholars, 8 there are two causes of this problem of aborting of female fetuses, namely, cultural conditioning and economics. The practice of aborting female fetuses detected through amniocentesis can be considered as one of the major reasons why the sex ratio of female to male is declining in India. Cultural conditioning of determining women's social worth by the number of male children they bear is the primary cause of this adverse sex ratio.
In , the sex ratio was females per males. Sex ratios were , and per males in , , respectively. This statistics demonstrates a steady decline of females throughout the 20th century. Adverse sex ratio has far reaching negative implications for Indian society as a whole and also for women, in particular. For the society as a whole, with the decrease of females, it creates socio-cultural perversion of natural or biological requirement. In any society, biological reproduction requires more women than men as a woman typically bears only one child at a time and men can impregnate many women.
It is the woman who contributes the most to the continuation of species as well as for the survival of the child by carrying the baby in the womb, providing the fetus with the tissues and nutrients from her own body and breastfeeding after birth. For the women, sex-determination test through amniocentesis has been used as an instrument of discrimination against the female fetus. The abuse of the technology of amniocentesis has made the situation of women worse in relation to sexual equality. There is no doubt that this is a violation of women's rights. Some people argue that the problem of overpopulation can be resolved, to some extent, by aborting female fetuses through sex-determination tests.
The rate of increase of population in India has not declined since In , the state of Maharashtra has passed an act called the "Maharashtra Regulation of use of Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques Act" to prevent the misuse of amniocentesis. This act is definitely an achievement but there are loopholes to this act which allow doctors to perform amniocentesis at clinics and hospitals on women who supposedly make a choice to abort female fetuses.
I believe that in a society where women are socially and culturally conditioned to accept that their social worth is dependent on being able to bear a male child, woman's choice is greatly influenced by fear. The so-called choices are the result of powerlessness and oppression of women. Women's movements in India have moved beyond the social and ethical realm to the political level but feminists are faced with tremendous obstacles due to religious, traditional and cultural orientation of the Indian society.
As pointed out in the previous section, laws are not sufficient if it cannot be enforced. I believe that in the case of India, if cultural relativists join hands with the feminists in the human rights front by asserting the rights of women, on the one hand, and on the other hand, trying to change that aspect of culture which violates a certain group's right without completely giving up the tradition and culture which has kept India united in the face of diversity of caste, custom, religion and ethnic background, then laws can be enforced to improve the status of women.
In conclusion, by analyzing the conflict between feminists and cultural relativists within the human rights discourse at the international level and explaining the similarities and differences between the two, I have showed that there is a common ground between these two currents. Then, I have taken the case study of sex-determination test of India to prove that the common ground of feminism and cultural relativism can be applied at the national level of India in solving the problems of aborting female fetus and in a larger scale balancing the female to male ratio.
In each case, each respective group tries to wrangle their. The novel is set in a dystopian future that illustrates the collapse of the US government, a new theocracy taking over, and how the theocracy has supposedly solved the problem of fertility with the creation. In her essay, Kilbourne illustrates how advertising normalizes, and sometimes encourages, behavior that is conducive to sexual violence against women and children. Morrison and Atwood both examine how unjust societies and imbalances of societal power lead to a disorientation of gender roles and identity, ultimately discussing the way in which those societies are able to reinforce their oppressive values down through the.
The role. The character in the novel showed different expectations for women and their supposed roles. One literary critic, Megan Kaplon showed how this novel can be viewed as a struggle of the world or society around her. This journal divided into three main focus there are the argument of cultural relativism and disagreement between the feminist. The second discuss about the possibility that they can operate together and the last section will be used cooperative approach to achieve their respective goals. Cultural Relativist Critique Words 5 Pages. This book also had positive and negative points. For example, a positive point is how women were trying to become independent, as well as gain their individual rights. She pointed out that the political assumption that there must be a general fundamental principle or stand point for feminism, one which must be found in an identity assumed to exist in every culture and situation, often goes along with the notion that the oppression of women has some particular form discernible in the general or hegemonic structure of patriarchy or male domination.
On the other hand, in as much as universal patriarchy may no longer enjoy its position of being generally accepted as before, it is difficult to get rid of the general shared conception of women. The Declaration of Independance and the Declaration of Sentiments are purposefully compared. For example, the colonists wrote the Declaration of Independence in order to inform the King of the unfairness and to take action and to make change. The Declaration of Sentiments does the exact same thing, only instead of the problems bing taxation without representation and the quartering acts, the issues were freedoms to vote, have property and own oneself apart from a spouse, followed by the promise to take action against the injustice.
Most importantly the second wave feminist approach avoids seeing morality as a contract, instead relying on the context of the matter, and instead of viewing reason as the main determinant of inquiry, rationality and morality, they use empathy. Here, second wave feminists critique thinkers like Aristotle, Rousseau and Kant as denying that women have the ability to reason, not only this, but these thinkers are devaluing female values and experiences.
According to the second wave feminists. Sara M. Evans and F. Carolyn Graglia each voice their opinions about the issue. Carolyn Graglia writes about how she agrees the movement has failed to liberate American women. This journal is talking about the Cultural Relativist and Feminist critiques, where the critiques are similar on International Human Rights.
The writer suggested short description of the criticism. According to the writer the critique made by the cultural relativist about international human right is that they reject the understanding that human right is universal by just being a human being or by virtue of being human and whose substance form and interpretation are not subject to variations in culture Donnelly Where the Feminist critique says, in reality the one who has more power to human right is man and they said that the gender equality and discrimination against woman is not a priority in International world.
The philosophers who defend moral relativism believe Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights moral right or wrong, Aron Gwinner Research Paper. Basically, cultural relativists would make a statement that compares a belief of Racism And Colonialism In Black Skin, White Masks, By Fanon culture to another. Zimbardo Vs. Milgrams Experiments the help of Gender On Sentencing and Mott, womens rights may have Analysis Of Cultural Relativist And Critique Of International Human Rights an overlooked issue yesterday and today, therefore, their message is incontestably crucial. The very situation of one human observed by another for the sake of "objective" study can be weirdly dehumanizing, even in the best of situations.