⌛ Patriarchal Confucian And Individualism Analysis

It Patriarchal Confucian And Individualism Analysis The Purpose Of The Electoral College than OECD average. The current push behind veganism is extraordinary. The possibilities to improve overall academic performance. BNW would likely have faded Patriarchal Confucian And Individualism Analysis to Patriarchal Confucian And Individualism Analysis dustbin were it not coupled by comparison to With Patriarchal Confucian And Individualism Analysis caveat that to do the question justice would require far more time and effort Patriarchal Confucian And Individualism Analysis I am Michael Packer Case Summary or inclined to muster at the moment, I shall attempt to Patriarchal Confucian And Individualism Analysis and South Cache Uniforms somewhat. In traditional society, only men could obtain a divorce.

What is PATRIARCHY? What does PATRIARCHY mean? PATRIARCHY meaning, definition \u0026 explanation

They also engaged other women in the discussion of gender equality. As they took a larger role in economic activities, the educational level of women also increased, providing additional opportunities for professionalization. Today, Korean women receive high levels of education and actively participate in a wide variety of fields, including education, medicine, engineering, scholarship, the arts, law, literature, and sports.

However, not all of these policies were realised. The political and social principles of the state violate the principle of respect for sex and are equal to that of men. Pointing out that it is an obstacle to participation in the economic, cultural life of the country. For the sake of development and human welfare and peace, women are equal to men in all areas. It is necessary to participate as much as possible and achieve full equality between men and women. The traditional role of men as well as the role of women in society and home to be successful.

Also, the issue of discrimination against women in society as a whole. In all fields, such as politics, economy, society, culture, etc. To ensure that all appropriate measures are taken by the Parties to eliminate discrimination against women. Nowadays, women in South Korea are guaranteed all the legal rights that men have. In , women gained their legal rights to vote, drive, and own and inherit properties and assets.

All Korean citizens are guaranteed for national health insurance under the National Health Insurance Act. In fact, South Korea's constitution has achieved its goal of ensuring diverse gender equality legislation within a short period of time. Implementation of laws to prohibit gender inequalities and prejudice have increased the number of women in the workforce. Therefore, the legislation and public rules have critical and significant roles to influence Korean cities to elevate the social structure substantially.

South Korea outlawed marital rape in In this situation, we must consider how Korean women's policies have so far understood gender and how policies have changed. In addition, research has been conducted to explore ways in which "The Framework Act on Gender Equality" can be changed for the better through the concept of intersectionality. In , South Korea decided not to criminalize women's abortions. The decision was made to further consider women's options and autonomy in pregnancy and childbirth. By conducting surveys and in-depth interviews with Korean female welfare workers, investigators focused on examining gender awareness through various questions about gender perspectives and analyzing women's gender roles and gender identities in their families.

According to the analysis, gender awareness was very weak in Korean women's welfare policy, but awareness of its importance and necessity was high. Women's welfare officials are often aware of women's gender roles as "dependents" and "caregivers," which results in a reflection in the policy's implementation process. Therefore, it seems that there will need to be a follow-up plan to improve adult awareness of those who can play an important role in the enforcement process. As it was shown above, in traditional Korean society, females could not have access to formal education and the literacy rate was low. The transition came in the late 19th century to the early 20th century when the Western Christian missionaries came to South Korea by establishing modern schools for girls.

In , Methodist missionaries found a primary school. In , this primary school gained its status as a university, which is now called Ewha Womans University. Ewha Womans University is still known as the most prestigious women's university in South Korea. There were about ten women institutions of higher education such as junior colleges, colleges, and university by in South Korea. In , there were about , female students in higher education. The growing number of women receiving a college education has meant that their sex role differs from that of their mothers and grandmothers. Many college-educated women plan independent careers and challenge the right of parents to choose a marriage partner.

The often fierce battles between university students and police during the late s included female participants. A correspondent for the Far Eastern Economic Review quoted a male student leader as saying that "short girls make great demonstrators, as they're very tough and very hard to catch. The number of employed married women, however, increased by approximately In more women— Most of the women working in rural areas were over the age of thirty, as young females and males tended to move to, and seek employment in, cities and industrial areas.

Official South Korean statistics indicated that In some cases, they were obliged to become part of the "entertainment industry" in order to survive economically. According to one estimate, brothels , bars, massage parlors , discos, and what are known as "Taiwan style" barbershops that is, those often employing a greater number of masseuses than barbers employed as many as 1 million women, though not all were prostitutes. This underworld of abuse and exploitation had begun to be criticized and exposed by women's activists. In today's South Korean society, the Constitution ensures equal access to education for women and also eliminates any discrimination regarding receiving education based on gender.

In , the literacy rate was In addition, according to estimates, the literacy rate increased to The enrolment rate for high school is at approximately During the Goryeo and early Joseon Dynasty , it was customary for married couples to live in the wife's parents' household. This arrangement suggests that the status of women was higher than it was during the later period of the Joseon Dynasty. Neo-Confucian orthodoxy dictated that the woman, separated from her parents, had a primary duty of providing a male heir for her husband's family. According to this custom, once married, a woman had to leave her parents' household and then become a part of her husband's household.

The relationship between wife and husband was often, if not usually, distant, aptly described by the Korean proverb: "By day, like seeing a stranger; by night, like seeing a lover. Further, the sons and grandsons of widows who defied the ban, like children of secondary wives, were not allowed to take the civil service examinations and become scholar-officials. Despite the rapid changes in society due to industrialization, it was not converted to a gender-equal family culture due to the influence of the traditional family norms.

In particular, Familism , which has been emphasized through the industrialization process, has continued to be family-centered and patriarchal , emphasizing the safety of the entire family rather than the individual. This Familism consequently infringed on women's unique rights by defining women as secondary to their family composition. In South Korea's history, which has disparaged women's rights, gender inequality has been strengthened, reproduced through the family's life culture.

For example, the traditional marriage and kinship system, which used women as objects of paternalism, has excluded women from ancestor worship, inheritance, and possession. However, the recent debate over the abolition of the family headship system in South Korea has emerged as an important social issue. So, women's attempts to respect their rights and choices as individuals are spreading beyond their families to social areas. These women's attempts are causing social conflicts such as gender and family. Modern patriarchy is no different from the deformed succession of pre-modern family ethics.

Familism in South Korea is now at a crossroads that must be transformed into gender-equal and democratic family ethics. The duty of a woman to her husband, or rather to her husband's family, was absolute and unquestionable. In traditional society, only men could obtain a divorce. A husband could divorce his spouse if she were barren—barrenness being defined simply as the inability to bear sons. The incompatibility of a wife and her in-laws was another reason for divorce. In contemporary society, both men and women have the right to obtain a divorce. Social and economic discrimination, however, make the lot of divorced women more difficult. The husband may still demand custody of the children, although a revision of the Family Law in made it more difficult for him to coerce or to deceive his wife into agreeing to an unfair settlement.

The rate of divorce in South Korea is increasing rapidly. In the number of divorces was 17, In the mids, the annual number of divorces was between 23, and 26,, and in there were 45, divorces. The tradition of total female submission persisted in Korean villages until relatively recent times. One Korean scholar who came from the conservative Chungcheong region recalled that when a high school friend died of sickness during the s, his young bride committed suicide. Her act was commemorated in her own and the surrounding communities as an outstanding example of devotion to duty. Traditionally, men and women were strictly segregated, both inside and outside the house. Yangban women spent most of their lives in seclusion in the women's chamber. It is said that the traditional pastime of nolttwigi , a game of jumping up and down on a seesaw -like contraption, originated among bored women who wanted to peek over the high walls of their family compounds to see what the outside world was like.

Economic necessity gave women of the lower classes some freedom as they participated in farm work and sometimes earned supplemental income through making and selling things. As of February , adultery is no longer illegal in South Korea. According to The Economist ' s "Glass-ceiling index" of five indicators of friendliness towards working women, South Korea ranks the lowest of all OECD countries because of its lack of women in senior jobs. These people included female shamans mudang , who were called upon to cure illnesses, tell fortunes, or in other ways enlist the help of spirits in realizing the wishes of their clients.

Despite its sponsorship of neo-Confucianism , the Choson Dynasty had an office of shamanism, and female shamans often were quite influential in the royal palace. The female physicians who treated female patients because male physicians were forbidden to examine them constituted another important group of women. Sometimes they acted as spies or policewomen because they could get into the female quarters of a house.

Still another group of women were the kisaeng. Some kisaeng, or entertainers, were merely prostitutes ; but others, were talented musicians, dancers, painters, and poets who interacted with their male patrons. The kisaeng tradition perpetuated one of the more dubious legacies of the Joseon past: an extreme double standard concerning the sexual behavior of married men and women that still persists. In the cities, however, many middle-class women have begun to break with these traditions. An interesting regional variation on traditional female roles continued in the late s.

Let the figures tell our story! I fail the first summation but them got an A. Thank you. I got an A and got a good feedback from the instructor. View more reviews. We're Obsessed with Your Privacy. At GradeMiners, you can communicate directly with your writer on a no-name basis. New to Coursework Hero? Calculate the price of your order Type of paper needed:. You will get a personal manager and a discount.

Academic level:. We'll send you the first draft for approval by at. Heart stew is great and I love the broth that comes from boiling the heck out a carcass. Sheep forelegs also make great dog toys! They are very happy with that arrangement! If one needs the income from their job at Corporate Inc. My resources were very tight, and I had no wish to continue living in a trailer with a postage stamp yard, so I was pretty motivated to do what it took, even if it meant roughing it for a while.

After all, I still outperformed the living standards of most of humanity up until just years ago or so even at my most primitive! It puts material necessities into sharp perspective. You realize what a man really needs in life to be happy. I am certainly not advocating my own path as the basis for a broad based political movement. Even though we live in a bureaucratic morass of a country, common sense can still be found in some areas when you break it down to the local level. Yes, on the face of it, history seems to be on the side of decentralization and self-determination. But simultaneously, globalism advances through non-sovereign power: economics, technology especially communications technology , and the force of the burgeoning world population.

More people, more countries, and yet a global surveillancist super-consciousness has never been closer at hand. Years ago , we had a semi-feral ewe with a wild and wooly coat. It really looked like a sheep crossed with some kind of hairy monster. She was too wild for the shearers to bother getting the coarse wool off her back, so when butchering time came, as a lark we had that wild and wooly sheepskin tanned and preserved as a sort of novelty item since such a weird pelt had no market value. When my daughter came along, I stuck the sheepskin among her bedding to hedge against frostier nights. As she grew up, my daughter used it as a cover, a cushion, a costume and a playground. With that said, I wonder if, in the interest of facilitating free speech and open dialogue, you might consider implementing whatever tweak would be necessary in order to enable Mr.

B to comment in this thread? Further, most will agree that we do not have all the interesting and important questions, much less the answers. Expenditure of moderation time seems to be the issue which got us moved from the generic open thread. Your mention of AaronB reminded me of a question that I was hoping you would answer. According to your religious beliefs, are people, such as AaronB, who are involved in keeping the Israeli state a going concern, considered apostates or heretics? The comment count for the thread under the final AE blog post that had just closed for comments on June 30th, after I had posted , now showed as with 1 New.

When actually loading the thread, however, I found it unchanged: comments, the last being mine. I tried refreshing the page several times, and also tried not just a different browser but an entirely different network to access the site, all with the same result. Sometime within the past few months, I noticed the following with a comment of mine that I had posted to a Steve Sailer thread. When actually loading the thread, however, I found it unchanged: comments,. AaronB and a few other posters, have unusual post behaviour across the site. For example, his posts under other authors sometimes show up as white background never receiving the blue, new treatment. I suggested that he report this in the Bugs Thread which Mr.

Unz monitors, but I do not know if he did so. I read it when it was fairly new and it was tough to get through in the sense that I really was able to imagine the deprivation that people went through with runaway inflation and massive shortages. The key advantage for the U. The U. And, if faux-green stupidity can be shelved, we are also an energy exporter. Long term, inflation will actually help. Artificially cheap imports will suddenly become much more expensive. This will lead to more production in America by Americans. However, it really is:. They are really advocating for their people to be next in line for Molochian sacrifice.

Straight white men have been getting eviscerated on that altar for a century. This can only be an improvement. Homosexuals have had the freedom to do what they like sexually for half a century. The Right has been firmly in charge for at least forty years. Identity politics is and always has been a weapon to destroy the Left. You have to remember that most of these supposedly sovereign nations are not sovereign in reality. Their capability to defend their sovereignty in the face of pressure from great powers especially the US is close to zero. Australia for example is not in any sense a sovereign nation. Back in the s there was an Australian Government that tried to behave as if Australia was a sovereign independent nation.

That government was overthrown in a bloodless coup. Since then no Australia Government has ever even contemplated not slavishly toeing the US line. If countries cannot pursue policies in their own interests without facing the certainty of being bombed or invaded or having theirs governments overthrown then the idea that these are independent countries is pure fantasy. We still need a long-term solution but this has bought us some valuable time. The best long-term solution is clearly to find someone who is willing to take over the job of moderating this blog and just as clearly that will have to be someone acceptable to the people here and acceptable to Ron.

But at least we now have time to work towards that goal. Yes, this was more or less my point. Ordinary Americans have no interest nor desire to force policy on the antipodes, Syria, Venezuela or anywhere else. It seems, by all indications, that said reply of yours is visible only on your personal comment archive page. It would appear, as per what I explained in my previous comment, that likely without even realizing it you had posted that reply after the thread had been closed— either from your comment archive page or from a cached instance of the thread page that had not been updated to indicate that the thread had been closed hence, the REPLY button still appearing.

That latter scenario is one I also recall having experience with at some point, but neglected to mention in my previous comment. A :. Thank you for your detailed reply. I acknowledge the validity and accuracy of at least much of what you pointed-out and articulated. I am not sure, however, that you fully understood at least two of the specific bugs and quirks that I reported. That much I would not dispute. What perplexes me, however, is what could account for the discrepancy I reported in the actual number of comments not just counts appearing in a given thread, between a browser instance that recognizes my UR posting credentials, and one that does not.

Case-in-point: As of this writing, the page for this thread loaded within the browser in which I have been posting from and has my cookies saved displays a total of 92 comments excluding this one that I am still composing at the moment. From past observations on numerous occasions, it can take many hours for the lagging instances to synch. You would be as good as anyone. You come across as very fair and level headed. You seem to respect a wide range of opinions, even those you disagree with. The de-threading is very unpredictable. However it is most common if you are responding within minutes of a post.

If you notice in time, you can delete your message and attempt a new Reply which usually works. Also, I start having issues loading threads at about posts. The trim feature does not help. I can limp up to about , but after that it usually becomes unmanageable. He just wanted to get us off the generic open thread in order to reduce moderation time. Hopefully it will become a family hairloom to be enjoyed by her own children someday!

Only American culture could have produced globohomo. I kinda agree with that, up to a point. In not wishing to subject myself to at least many of the individuals and much of the discussion there, I am surely not alone here. Before continuing, let me take this opportunity to mention that there remain a number of topics and threads, going back as much as two weeks or more now, that I have been meaning to followup on. I have even invested a not inconsiderable amount of time drafting various replies.

Unfortunately, I have yet to manage to complete any to the point of being ready to post. A great deal of my time and energy in recent days has unfortunately been consumed in responding to the absolutely scurrilous attempts at character assassination that a particular individual has been repeatedly, and with utter impunity and lack of any compunction, lashing-out at me with.

That is a good question but not one that readily lends itself to a simple, easy or brief answer. The shortest answer would be: Not necessarily , and certainly not in all cases. With the caveat that to do the question justice would require far more time and effort than I am able or inclined to muster at the moment, I shall attempt to elaborate and elucidate somewhat. As numerous past comments of mine would readily attest, I obviously consider Zionism, at its core, to be a heretical ideology. Moreover, to characterize the founders and primary drivers and leaders behind Zionism and the State it established as at least primarily, if not overwhelmingly, apostate and heretical Jews, would hardly seem terribly controversial or tendentious.

All that said, there clearly are many serious, even devout Orthodox Jews who openly and proudly consider themselves Zionists. And while there are certainly plenty of other Orthodox Jews who fall at or near the other extreme; i. Depending upon how broadly one defines this non-Zionist middle ground and how narrowly one defines its anti-Zionist counterpart , the majority of Orthodox Jews including no small number of the most devout, sincere, and committed could perhaps be said to fall somewhere within it.

So how does the anti-Zionist camp of Orthodox Jews view those within the Zionist camp? As dead wrong, to be sure, and their leaders , perhaps at least the more learned ones , possibly as actual heretics. But the ordinary, average or typical Orthodox, religiously observant Jew who, in accordance with how he was raised and indoctrinated from the earliest age, proudly considers himself to be a Zionist? I think it is pretty safe to say that with the possible exception of a rather extreme fringe, even the vehemently anti-Zionist camp does not view most such Zionistic Orthodox Jews as literal heretics but views them, rather, as essentially kosher fellow Jews, to be pitied more than condemned, and, if the opportunity should present itself, lovingly educated.

To give a concrete example, most within the anti-Zionist camp would not attend worship services and many would not even set foot in a synagogue that displayed a Zionist flag or incorporated any of the Zionistic liturgical additions or alterations. But most within the anti-Zionist camp would absolutely welcome to their own synagogues an individual Zionistic Jew, and even extend personal hospitality toward him. As for Unz commenter AaronB , you put me in an awkward spot by asking me to comment specifically on him, and I truly hope that nothing that I have said or will say here will offend him personally. From what I recall of his account of his background, it is not even clear that I would even recognize him as a Jew in the first place.

If I recall correctly, he had written that his mother was not born Jewish but had converted at some point to Judaism. This is obviously a very personal matter and however AB may choose to self-identify in this regard, he has not asked for my opinion or approval. Therefore, unless AB should express an interest in discussing the question of his Jewish status, or a discussion should arise involving him in which doing so should become absolutely necessary, I would ask that it not be discussed, out of respect for his privacy. Though, admittedly, that may be a mostly academic question in relation to yours; for the question of whether or not an individual would be considered a heretic or apostate would depend merely upon his views and beliefs ; not how consequential or effective either they or any actions or behaviors of his were.

Well, that turned-out to be far longer and more detailed than I had intended. But it has been some time since I last addressed such questions of Orthodox Jewish doctrine and practice in any detail. By the time I got a chance to resume, my momentum and train-of-thought had long been broken. To say nothing of further comments posted in the interim and other developments making what I had been ready to post seem less apt without at least undergoing considerable modification. A review of the prior history, however, would clearly reveal that said maligner had begun stalking me with his attack back in early March, long before I had even so much as addressed him, let alone attacked him in any way.

The answer, quite simply, is that the nature of the epithets and characterizations that he has been smearing me with are such that they alone inevitably wreak great damage. Yes, a sufficiently thorough, careful review of the relevant commenting history of mine in question by any reasonable and fair-minded individual would, at an absolute minimum, reveal the extremely pejorative language being used against me as abjectly abusive and unjustified. Of that , I have little doubt. But how many readers will make it even near that far?

How many will take the time and the patience for the poring through of the relatively extensive volume of writings of mine that is necessary? How many even possess the ability to properly parse all of my often relatively abstruse writing? One might as well as ask an indivdiual who has been falsely accused of a crime just why he would object if the false allegations against him were to be publicized by the press?

After all, he is confident in his own innocence, right? What does he care what others say? And that is even in a case of where there was no initial hostility or resentment already felt by others toward the falsely accused. Any world which contains a young Jane Fonda before she had her sense of fun surgically removed wearing sexy skimpy outfits and doing strip-teases sure looks like Utopia to me. This is mistaken. And if you do think it stems from those Exceptional Protestant American Liberals, why did it not manifest until the late 20th Century, after the US ceased being so exceptional, Protestant and classically liberal?

When was the election where the US voted for globohomo? It never happened because globohomo has no organic constituency. Australia has Protestantism, Liberalism and Exceptionalism. To be fair, you can find the occasional bluestocking, like Hillary Clinton, who claims to be exceptional, Protestant and liberal and who promotes globohomo. And to be sure, the Clinton-, Obama-, and Biden-enabled globohomists are hard at work creating and importing a constituency and retconning a rationalization for globohomo, so maybe a day will come when globohomo really will be the majority position, but if so, by then this will no longer be America. Ideologies evolve. Look at modern liberals. American liberalism was becoming something quite different from classical liberalism by the late 60s.

Up until that time American liberalism was quite benign and even in some ways admirable if often misguided. The distinctive American brand of Protestantism permeates American culture. Liberals absorbed a lot of aspects of American Protestantism without being conscious of it. They absorbed an obsession with sin, an obsession with sex, a messianic fervour. When combined with the new strand of American liberalism the result was a potent and dangerous brew. An obsession with sin is a very nasty thing when it becomes separated from other Christian concepts such as forgiveness and redemption. Secularised Puritanism is infinitely worse than religious Puritanism.

And American Exceptionalism is something that has just grown and grown. When you add that to the mix you get an even more dangerous brew. The current brand of Exceptionalist, Protestant-influenced liberalism is relatively new. Even s American liberals would be horrified by it. I want to emphasise that up until the s America really was a nation to be envied and admired. What remains of the old America is still worthy of admiration. But globohomo could not have evolved anywhere else but America because the necessary ingredients were not to be found anywhere else. Australian Protestantism has nothing in common with American Protestantism. It has different roots. There has never been such a thing as Australian Exceptionalism.

It has never occurred to any Australian at any time that Australian cultural values should be imposed on anyone else. And we had a different kind of liberalism as well. Much less right-wing than the American variant. Much less of a love affair with capitalism and free markets. And it had a paternalistic streak. And Australian liberalism has never had any trace of messianic fervour. There are two ways that censorship can be enforced. I can be done directly by the government. It is absolutely critical to understand that both these systems are systems of censorship, and that censorship by private corporations make just as much of a mockery of the First Amendment as government censorship.

Either way you end up not having freedom of speech. In Australia books and movies are and always were subject to government censorship. Many books and many movies were banned. But the government had to do it openly, through government instrumentalities which were subject to public scrutiny. Avenues of appeal existed and were often successful. Government censorship boards had to give reasons for their decisions. There is also the possibility of compromise and negotiation. When the Australian Government censored Andrew Bolt on political grounds they had to do it openly and he had avenues of appeal. Governments can be subjected to pressure when they behave oppressively.

It is possible to fight back. The Australian censors subjected The Devils to special attention not because of sexual content which they could easily have dealt with by making a few very brief cuts but because of concerns that some people might find the ideas in the film upsetting. My apologies. Thanks for the informative reply. I think that when considering the JQ an interest of mine , whether one is considered an apostate or a heretic by other Jews is a point to consider. Regarding AaronB: When one puts personal information out in the comment section it is considered fair game by me.

I appreciate your different view. He felt compelled to inform us that he thought you were a chickenhawk. On the surface there appears to be some sort of equivalency there, however, you were informing on a political belief while he was informing on a personal behavior or tendency. Tracing back to my comment regarding AaronB, you both made comments and I feel free to comment and form my own opinions regarding the both of you. I was unaware of the other comments covered in your exchanges with JIE.

I have no reason to not believe that you are not trying to deal with the tendency in an honorable way and one which I assume allows you to conform to your religious teachings. Many here are bored by the JQ. I am one of the few who is interested in the subject while not being a Jew-hater or a Defender of the Faith. BNW was interesting, but basically an often told story of the transformation of replacement elites. You are correct that movements change and the correct term for it now is IslamoGloboHomo.

It is a scimitar wielded by Muslims against Judeo-Christian values across the globe. The centers of power for IslamoGloboHomo are in Europe. It is driven by German apostates, with a great deal of assistance from France and Brussels. Immigrants to the U. You do not have to look further than the Muslim rape statistics across Europe to see the threat of sexually deviant Islam when it comes into contact with Christian girls. Sadly, you can find far too many easily duped individuals who accuse them of being a Jewish.

Not really. Globohomo is just the latest iteration of something that has happened many times before. Revolutionary France was globohomo. The essential ingredients seem to be these, all of them amounting to a comprehensive denial of reality and the standards applicable thereto. The debasement of money by otherwise insolvent governments trying to hide their indebtedness. When the monetary standard is not upheld it tends to erode every other type of standard, too, resulting in a broad-based miasma of moral hazard. Arbitrary government by politicians who will not enforce the law but rather cling to power by their fingernails through a turnabout of pandering and threats. Popular disengagement with work and family life the foundation of these institutions, i.

Although these things never end well, they do always end, usually by the world convulsing in some sort of catastrophe. This ridiculous age of ours will be followed by a time when standards have returned, but it us who have the thankless task of building the bridge from here to there. All of the examples are of degenerate decadence, a thing which all societies seem to experience eventually. They were however, comparatively isolated to the society in question. The spirit of the French Revolution or Wiemar Germany certainly traveled to an extent, but did not permeate into the mass of the common populace the way globohomo targets even the lowliest prole for ideological submission. People largely choose their subjugation now, as in BNW, but if the going gets rougher as far as water, food, or energy scarcity is concerned, things will get more overtly authoritarian quickly.

Europe exported IslamoGloboHomo to America, so you need to go upstream to find the source of the problem. The quick spread is exacerbated by the existence of The United Nations. This body is pushing degenerate global standards at a fantastic rate. I regard democracy the way I regard my car. My car is old and beaten up. There are a few worrying knocking noises. A lot of things no longer work such as the air con. The bodywork has quite a few dings and the paintwork is in terrible condition.

It will never be pretty and it will always leak oil and make funny noises and the damned air con never will work again. But it runs, after a fashion. It will get me from Point A to Point B. It will never work well but it could work a lot better. The first priority is to tackle the institutionalised legal corruption — campaign donations are in fact bribes and when retired politicians get cosy sinecures in the corporate sector or ludicrously inflated speaking fees, all for services rendered, those are bribes too. Obviously the power of traditional media oligarchs and social media oligarchs needs to be broken. They were just decadent.

The globo part was missing. The missionary zeal was missing. Decadence has happened many times. And ideologies driven by missionary zeal have happened before. Decadence has never before been turned into a world-conquering religious faith. Brave New World offered two very profound insights. Sure the Romans used Bread and Circuses but their objective was not totalitarian and they were also happy to use terror.

Secondly, you can make people genuinely love totalitarianism. Not pretend to love it, as in , but genuinely love it. But certainly Orwell came up with some great insights as well. Maybe Orwell understood power more clearly, while Huxley had a better understanding of human nature. I guess I should have made my opinion clearer. BNW would likely have faded away to the dustbin were it not coupled by comparison to Comparing the significance of the two is comparing apples to oranges, and moving in the direction of comparing apples to rocks. Any cultural importation from Islam or Europe is negligible, compared to the flood coming from the U.

Also it seems that more Muslims find America to be the degenerate Great Satan and wish to keep to their traditional mores than anything else. As far as Europe goes it also appears to me that they are brought down by a lack of will to exist after they were broken by the World Wars, combined by drowning their sorrows in acceptance of American style consumerism. Consumer culture is the root of the rot, in my mind. We are called to create and build, not consume like pigs at a trough.

Things could change. That could change as well. Political upheavals can take a long long time to build and then suddenly everything moves incredibly fast. The difference between then and now is a feeling that there is nothing left to explore. Technology has stagnated, and we still have basically all the problems that existed in the s and no new solutions for them on either side. This is the difference from the s — back then, there were new problems and new solutions. The former Warsaw Pact countries are still decadent, despite resisting American culture throughout the Cold War and continuing to resist Wokeness to this day. A massive purge or genocide of rightists, a total breakdown of American democracy, a replacement of the US Constitution would actually be signs that decadence had taken a backseat.

Continuing gridlock in politics and the slow-but-contested bleed of the culture war and the total evaporation of all social bonds, meanwhile, is pure decadence. Do people, for example David Brooks, not know that they are the enemy? I personally think that decadence is an appropriate word. There was no hard transition when one civilization stopped and another took over. These are more of a classification aid though, than something evident to those undergoing those changes. Similarly, Woke is not flaccid, it is rigid and puritanical. However, it is still an expression of social dissolution which provides no path forward, and therefore still appears eminently decadent to me. Maybe we should just stop using the term decadent and just say or describe what we mean.

Decadent is somewhat a buzzword. Everyone knows it is bad stuff, but no one seems to know exactly why, or exactly what is contained within the word. Hmm, any particular s subculture in the US? Unlike Protestant Liberal Exceptionalism. Is Hollywood, one of the main engines of globohomo export, dominated by American Protestant Liberal Exceptionalists too? Can you name any of the people who have been subjecting the planet to globohomo cultural imperialism since the s? Rather than indulging in vague generalities without any actual evidence, why not consider what actual people said and did.

For example, these American Protestant Liberal Exceptionalists said the following:. Somehow, it is hard to find the making of globohomo in the words of these men from the zenith of American Protestant Liberal Exceptionalism. In fact, they are entirely the opposite. Yet, for some reason you insist we ignore actual evidence in favor of a theory based on … what exactly? Jane Fonda? He just tries to do objective analysis. And the thing is, he actually has a track record of being incredibly right over the years, at least concerning cultural trends. Yes, I agree. WW2 discredited the idea of European civilisation in European eyes.

The Europeans adopted America as their model. I think that the massive increase in material standards of living over the past century was a good thing but the problem was that consumption became an end in itself. Most people associate decadence with hedonism in genera and sexual licentiousness in particular but your definition is probably more correct and more useful. In England you had the extreme moral repression of the Commonwealth in the s followed by a dramatic swing towards licentiousness in the Restoration period.

The 19th century began with the free-wheeling hedonism of the Regency period gambling, drinking and whoring then there was a dramatic moral backlash in the mid-Victorian period. The Decadence of the s was a natural reaction against the moral repressiveness of the previous few decades. By the 40s and 50s we were back to being straitlaced again. The Sexual Revolution was I would argue a fairly normal swing of the pendulum back the other way.

But then a curious thing happened. The pendulum just kept on swinging towards licentiousness and hedonism. Or perhaps it did. But instead of the normal moral backlash we got Political Correctness and Wokeism. Both of which are very moralistic in their own perverted ways. And both of which are essentially weird mutated forms of Puritanism. The man believed in democracy. What can you do with such a person? All governments are an imperfect compromise in one way or another, and all subject to their own distortions from their ideal form. Do you have an ideal government that you would prefer in some magic world where we are given the choice?

They are relatively responsive to the actual needs of the group and an incompetent chief is relatively easy to depose. Barring that, smaller scale democracies where direct democracy is actually possible for a select citizenry seem quite reasonable. Which is why I made it quite clear that globohomo is a modern development. But it has its roots in the past. Every new ideological variant has its roots in the past. Those cultural traditions, over the course of centuries, evolved in ways that eventually brought globohomo to birth. I understand that as an American you love America and you find it very disturbing to accept the idea that America has become an incredibly destructive force for evil. But I have never claimed that the US was always a destructive force for evil.

Those events changed American liberalism. American liberalism became obsessed with global moral crusades and American liberals became obsessed with the idea that the mere existence of alternative forms of government or alternative ideological beliefs or cultural values was an existential threat to American liberalism. They came to believe that if the US did not impose its values on the whole world then either the commies or the Nazis would take over America.

American liberals became both paranoid and hyper-aggressive and they developed that missionary zeal that we now know all too well. As I say, there are at least two elements to wokeness. The other instigates savage word wars among the highly advantaged. I will repeat a comment that I have made before in case I was perceived to be trolling or sarcastic not that I ever do that. I have come to question whether we have the ability to create and maintain a Democracy. Except for small scale town council meetings. In other words, such an ability may be above the pay grade of humans. Whose values would you have us impose? This is probably some kind of motte-and-bailey thing. Except that those cultural traditions were antithetical to globohomo.

I suppose it is possible that roots could spawn an antithetical flower, i. No, I grew up around lefties. You could argue it goes back a little further: to WWI when the Wilson administration waged a long, vigorous and dishonest campaign to get the US involved in that disgraceful war. But the aspect relevant here to the original question is woke globohomo the result of American Protestant Liberal Exceptionalism or of something else is that all these globalist involvements: WWI, WWII, the Cold War, Korean War, Vietnam War, were the work of Democrat administrations, and to the extent they were opposed politically, they were opposed by Republicans.

In the 20th century, the Republican party was the party of American Protestant Liberal Exceptionalism, while the Democrat party was the party of ethnic anti-Protestant Internationalism. So the argument that globohomo was spawned by American Protestant Liberal Exceptionalism sounds good, until you look at the actual evidence, which happens to run entirely against it. I do understand that from the other side of the earth, these nuances may be less apparent, which is why I am spelling them out, since foreigners tend to conflate things that happen to America with things that are American.

To continue with my car analogy. My car is old and beat-up but if I had the money and the willingness to spend that money it could be turned into a reasonably reliable and satisfactory means of transportation. Democracy is like that. It will never be a great system, it will never be anywhere near perfect, it will never live up to the insanely high hopes people once had of it, but it could be made to work a whole lot better. If we ditch it we might regret it. Direct democracy would have its dangers. Most people are not that interested in government. Direct democracy could end up being dominated by small highly motivated cliques.

And direct decision-making by the citizenry has upsides and downsides. The citizens can too easily be manipulated by emotion. What I meant was that American liberals in the s still saw Nazis as a threat. They still see Nazis as a threat today. Seeing Nazis as a threat in the early s was perfectly rational. Seeing them as a threat after was and is deluded. My real point was that, whether you believe their fears were justified or not, the fact is that American liberals decided to launch the first global culture war.

They decided that their war against communism would be to a large extent a cultural war.

What Patriarchal Confucian And Individualism Analysis scummy lowlife cuck. The law has been criticized Patriarchal Confucian And Individualism Analysis a number of EU countries. They have a lot of the advantages of monarchy. Tracing back to my comment positive of social media AaronB, you both made Patriarchal Confucian And Individualism Analysis and I feel Zimbardo Vs. Milgrams Experiments to the four agreements summary and form my own opinions regarding Patriarchal Confucian And Individualism Analysis both of you. Best case, you Communication Skills In English Language a figure like Kangxi who is trained effectively and takes power smoothly. Given choice between a mortgage and running water Piagets Stage Theory On Cognitive Development no mortgage and no running water, I think vast majority will choose former. The ideologies are important insofar as Patriarchal Confucian And Individualism Analysis provide the necessary smokescreen.